developer.jelix.org n'est plus utilisée, et existe uniquement pour son historique. Postez les nouveaux tickets sur le compte github.
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
#883 closed bug (wontfix)
impossible to have a different urlengine for each entry points of a same application
| Reported by: | foxmask | Owned by: | laurentj |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | jelix:core | Version: | 1.1.1 |
| Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
| Blocking: | Documentation needed: | no | |
| Hosting Provider: | Php version: |
Description
In my defaultconfig.ini.php i put
[urlengine] engine=simple
I have 2 entries point :
index.php admin.php
the config.ini.php of the first contains :
[urlengine] engine=significant
in the second config.ini.php i have :
[urlengine] engine=simple
The goal is to have significant URL on the "public" part of the site and simple URL in the "admin" part.
But unfortunalty the signficant engine takes precedence on all others ones.
If i use basic_significant as engine for "index.php" entry point, then the engine of "admin.php" is use correclty as "simple".
Change History (4)
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed 9 years ago by laurentj
- Component changed from jelix to jelix:core
- Owner set to laurentj
- Severity changed from major to minor
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by laurentj
- Summary changed from urlengine not used correctlty to impossible to have a different urlengine for each entry points of a same application
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 1 Changed 9 years ago by foxmask
Bonsoir,
Replying to laurentj:
But unfortunalty the signficant engine takes precedence on all others ones.
wrong. the problem is just that it is the current engine which is used.
pour la faire un français et eviter une incomprehension : si c'était le cas ; comme se fait-il que si on utilise comme moteur pour l'entry point "index.php", "basic_significant" et "simple" pour "admin.php", cela ne pose psa de problème ?
However, for me, this bug is invalid because in fact here you have two applications.
non c'est une appli (un forum) avec 2 entry point un pour le frontoffice un pour le backoffice
And then you cannot call jUrl to generate an url of an other application. If for you these aren't different application, so you have to use the same url engine. this is obvious for me.
ok donc fermons ce bug, je passerai tout sous le même moteur d'url, c'est un peu longuet avec le significant engine, mais pas injouable.
If we really want to fix this bug, it is needed to rewrite the url engine architecture.
je ne m'y aventurerai pas ;)
cdt.
comment:4 Changed 8 years ago by laurentj
- Resolution set to wontfix
- Status changed from new to closed
wrong. the problem is just that it is the current engine which is used.
However, for me, this bug is invalid because in fact here you have two applications. And then you cannot call jUrl to generate an url of an other application. If for you these aren't different application, so you have to use the same url engine. this is obvious for me.
If we really want to fix this bug, it is needed to rewrite the url engine architecture.